If a compliance software costs $12,000 a year. Does that sound like a high price?
The replacement it makes will determine the final answer.
If automating the collection of evidence in a complicated technology-driven environment will eliminate hundreds of hours of repetitive work it could be a well-spent amount of money. If a seven-person startup could gather the same evidence manually in a few minutes each month, the calculation is quite different.
That’s a useful way to approach the search for an Vanta alternative. Don’t begin by asking which one has the greatest features. Determine how much time and effort these features can save your business.
Automation Can be a Break-Even Economic The Key
Automating compliance isn’t inherently beneficial or harmful. Its value changes with scale. Imagine a company in the field of technology which is growing, numerous cloud environments, many applications, and regular changes in access. The effort of manually capturing evidence over time could become extremely high. Integrations that automatically monitor systems and record evidence easily justify the cost.
Imagine a small-scale business of 10 employees preparing for its first SOC 2 audit. It might have a small infrastructure, and the evidence collection could be handled with minimal automation.
That difference matters when evaluating Vanta pricing. A sophisticated platform can provide significant capabilities, however those capabilities can only provide financial value when the company actually needs they.
Compare Architecture and Not Just Brands
Searching for Vanta or Drata can quickly become a feature-by-feature exercise. Both are reputable software for compliance that is built around automation and integrations. As such, looking at their supported frameworks and integrations, services, contracts, and individual quotes are useful for businesses looking to implement this approach.
There’s another decision to make first. Is your company interested in an integrated platform that can help you achieve compliance? Certain businesses want continuous monitoring and automated collection of evidence. Some businesses prefer to collect evidence on their own.
Vanta Competitors Don’t All Follow the Same Model
A number of well-known Vanta competitors compete within the same category of automation. On the market, there are platforms with less cluttered designs which focus more on the organization of systems rather and connectivity.
CertAssist fits into this category. CertAssist was created by compliance consultants, internal auditors as well as other experts, organizes control frameworks within a central workspace. It allows for the editing of policies and guidelines for evidence, and allows auditors to view evidence through read-only access.
It doesn’t set up agents or connect to the infrastructure system. Customers can upload their own evidence.
Access to the Factor System into the Decision
It is clear that cutting off integrations is a disadvantage. One must gather evidence by hand.
This is a way to eliminate the need for integration and the application of compliance is not dependent upon any connection to the operational environment.
The design and architecture of one is not superior to each other. Which choice is best for your business?
CertAssist targets teams of five to 200 employees and offers pricing information instead of having an in-person sales meeting. The starting price is $225 per month, that’s a difference from the normal price of $375 a month.
Let Complexity Take Its Rightful Place
The requirements of a 10 person start-up today might not necessarily match its requirements at 100 or 500 employees.
A simple platform could make sense, while compliance is simple. When systems, employees frameworks, and evidence requirements increase, the financials could eventually favor greater automation. It’s a more efficient way to invest in compliance technology to let complexity earn its rightful place.
Don’t spend money on fifty integrations just because they look impressive on a comparison chart. You should purchase them only when the cost to do the task manually is more expensive.